Topics / 🏷️ Pricing

Why we lowered our pricing near the height of inflation

Jen Yip of Lunch Money explains why, in summer 2023, she replaced a flat $100 annual plan with pay-what-you-want pricing from $40 to $150. A year later, she reports nearly doubled MRR, steady user growth and healthier churn and trial conversion, though the Mint shutdown muddies the cause.

Read the original on lunchmoney.app ↗

We link to the original and never republish it. All credit to Jen Yip.

Key takeaways

  1. Yip raised prices with each major feature launch until signups slowed at $8 per month, then used discounts and a final increase to $10 per month, and only new subscribers saw the increases.
  2. Pay-what-you-want worked in part because people chose to pay more: only 10% of legacy users switched to a lower price, and the 37% of users paying above $100 annually account for over 60% of revenue.
  3. Average revenue per user fell, but Yip reports that subscriber lifetime value is trending up and margins stay high.
  4. Letting users pause a subscription and keep their data instead of canceling coincided with better churn and trial conversion rates.
  5. Yip says the experiment was affordable because Lunch Money is bootstrapped and profitable, web-first, and runs with a lean part-time contractor team.
  6. The results are hard to attribute cleanly, since Mint shut down a few months after the change and sent many new users to Lunch Money.

Who it's for

Bootstrapped SaaS founders who are profitable and weighing whether lower or flexible pricing could grow their user base and retention.

Why it's worth your time

It is an honest, numbers-backed account of going against the market on pricing, including the caveat that the Mint shutdown makes it hard to prove the price change alone drove the growth.

More on pricing

All 28 →

The best founder writing, in your inbox

Hand-picked essays, talks and decks from the founders who built the companies. Free, and you can unsubscribe any time.